SEMINAR DESCRIPTION

This course will surface the ways in which LGBTQ+ people and communities have impacted the ways in which mainstream American culture has been shaped by cultural production derived from thinking that challenges heteronormativity in post-World War II America until the validation of same sex marriage in 2014 Through the lenses of queer theory, evolving queer history, Since the emergence of “homosexuality” and “transsexuality” as identities in the late 19th century, queer culture has been presumed to develop in the margins of American life, ancillary to and shaped by heterosexual norms. Yet, the vast majority of queer people in the last hundred years have lived (to at least some degree) in the closet, allowing them to exist in the mainstream while maintaining a distinctly non-normative identity. Thus, to quote bell hooks, allowing them "to bring the margin into the center." In 15 meetings over the course of the semester, through lectures, discussions, texts, slides, films and video, we will explore the ways in which transformative integration of queer designs for living have occurred. Highlighting pivotal events and shifts in American cultural, political, and creative history this course will provide food for thought about the ways in queerness is integral to American notions of progress and freedom.

Thursday, February 22, 2024

Sam U. February 19, 2024 “Food for Thought: Thinking about Warhol: Posted by Sam Uroza”

 Andy Warhol not only was known for his unique and colorful looking pieces and the significance they have behind them, but also with how he created such said pieces. He used to do traditional paintings by hand with a paint and brush, but he gained further recognition when he utilized the technique of silk screening to make his most popular pieces known to date. The act of silk screening is when a mix of ink is squeezed over a mesh with a picture of the subject as the silk screen sits on top of the canvas. The ink would pass through the mesh and imprint his image onto the canvas. Many artists have tried to replicate his techniques, but some found it rather difficult to do. This made his pieces even more unique and allowed them to stand on their own for a while. But as more experienced artists and eventually machines were able to easily replicate his work, they produced them on various objects to be sold in mass production. This is somewhat ironic as it plays into his whole interest behind the effects mass production and consumerism has on building a society. Besides this, he was also able to introduce a unique form of art making into the art community that with practice, anyone can replicate to make their own pop art pieces. We can already see how this was replicated as many fashion designers were able to print his pieces onto their own clothing. His pieces can still be seen being sold today everywhere and reminds us of his beliefs in the way consumerism affects the inner workings of a society and how even his own work plays a part in it.

Andy Warhols Silk Screening Process | Hamilton-Selway

No comments:

Post a Comment

Erika Bauer - Final Project

 Link to my final project https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/10M3X31MtgSnCAicMzf6pDhINFAjSNRaGX8BJnh3_9Eg/edit